ThreatListPro vs Geo-Blocking

Geo-blocking restricts access by country. ThreatListPro blocks specific malicious IPs regardless of location. Many organizations use geo-blocking as a first defense against VPN brute force, but it has significant limitations.

By ThreatListPro Security Team · Published February 27, 2026 · Last verified: February 28, 2026

~0%
ThreatListPro false positives
High
Geo-blocking false positives
2M+
Individual IPs tracked

Geo-blocking and IP blocklists are both firewall-level defenses against VPN brute force attacks, but they work in fundamentally different ways. Geo-blocking uses a sledgehammer approach, denying all traffic from entire countries. ThreatListPro uses a scalpel, blocking only the specific IP addresses that have been observed attacking VPN portals. The trade-offs between these approaches are significant.

Quick Comparison

Feature ThreatListPro Geo-Blocking
Blocks Legitimate Users No Yes (entire countries blocked)
Handles Distributed Attacks Yes No (attacks from allowed countries pass through)
Specificity Individual malicious IPs Entire country IP ranges
False Positives Near zero High (blocks travelers, VPN users, remote workers)
Updates Weekly automated Manual country list management
Price $9.99/mo Free (built into firewalls)
Best For Precise threat blocking Reducing bulk traffic from unused regions

The Problem with Geo-Blocking

Geo-blocking is appealing because it is free, easy to understand, and reduces attack volume dramatically. But it comes with serious limitations that organizations often discover only after deployment.

False Positives Are Inevitable

When you block an entire country, you block every legitimate user in that country. This includes:

Attackers Bypass Geo-Blocking Easily

Sophisticated attackers do not launch campaigns from their home country. They use:

Reality check: ThreatListPro data shows that 15-20% of VPN brute force attacks originate from US-based IP addresses, primarily cloud providers and compromised residential connections. Geo-blocking cannot touch these.

When to Choose ThreatListPro

When Geo-Blocking Is Useful

Best Practice: Use Both Together

The strongest defense combines both approaches. Geo-blocking handles the bulk reduction of attack traffic from regions where you have no business presence. ThreatListPro handles the targeted blocking of specific attacker IPs from everywhere else, including domestic cloud infrastructure that geo-blocking cannot touch.

Recommended layered setup

Frequently Asked Questions

Does geo-blocking stop VPN brute force attacks?

Geo-blocking reduces VPN brute force attack volume but does not stop it. It blocks all traffic from selected countries, eliminating attacks from those regions. However, sophisticated attackers use VPS infrastructure and botnets in allowed countries, bypassing geo-restrictions entirely.

Should I use geo-blocking and ThreatListPro together?

Yes. Geo-blocking eliminates bulk attack traffic from countries where you have no users. ThreatListPro catches the remaining attacks from allowed countries by blocking specific malicious IPs. Together, they provide broader coverage than either solution alone.

What are the main problems with geo-blocking?

False positives and incomplete coverage. Geo-blocking blocks all traffic from entire countries, including legitimate travelers, remote workers, and business partners. Meanwhile, it does nothing against attacks from cloud servers and botnets in allowed countries.

Is geo-blocking free?

The feature itself is built into most enterprise firewalls at no additional cost. However, it requires time to configure, ongoing maintenance as business needs change, and incident response when legitimate users are blocked. The hidden labor cost can exceed the price of a purpose-built blocklist service like ThreatListPro at $9.99/month.

Try ThreatListPro Free for 30 Days

Block VPN brute force attackers by IP, not by country. Zero false positives. 5-minute setup.

Start Free Trial